<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8.0-dev (info@mypapit.net)" -->
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>SIgn Up For Our RSS Feed</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:51:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.8.0-dev (info@mypapit.net)</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/ninjarsssyndicator.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />        <item>
            <title>Russians Develop DUI Camera</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/russians-develop-dui-camera.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<em>Handheld device claims to remotely detect the presence of alcohol in a moving vehicle.</em><br /><br />Localities may one day issue tickets for the crime of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) by mail. The Russian firm Laser Systems has developed Alcolaser, a device that uses lasers to remotely detect the presence of alcohol vapors in an automobile. The Alcolaser is available in either in the form of a handheld gun the size of a police radar or in a mounted version designed to work from a moving police car.<br /><br />The device takes about half-a-second to scan an automobile. According to the manufacturer, the laser has a range of 65 feet and can test vehicles moving at up to 75 MPH. Laser Systems claims that Alcolaser can detect amounts as small as a quart of beer or 3.5 ounces of vodka without being fooled by other sources of ethanol
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/russians-develop-dui-camera.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/russians-develop-dui-camera.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ASSET speed camera also checks your seatbelt, insurance, can call the police all by its lonesome</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/asset-speed-camera-also-checks-your-seatbelt-insurance-can-call-the-police-all-by-its-lonesome.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>By <a href="http://www.engadget.com/editor/tim-stevens">Tim Stevens</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/editor/tim-stevens/rss.xml"></a>posted Nov 8th 2010 9:13AM</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/speedcamera">Speed cameras</a> have dubious legality in many places here in the States, but over in Europe they're an ugly fact of life. Now they're getting smarter, and the first is going into deployment in Finland. It's called ASSET, the Advanced Safety and Driver Support for Essential Road Transport, which confusingly abbreviates to ASDSERT and is the product of £7 million in government funding and years of development. Each of the £50,000 (about $80,000) cameras can naturally tell just how fast you're going and, if you're speeding, take a picture of you and your license plate number. That's just the beginning. It can also look up the status of your insurance, tell if you're wearing a seatbelt, and ding you for tailgating, all while sitting alone on the side of the road, relying on a wireless data connection and an internal
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/asset-speed-camera-also-checks-your-seatbelt-insurance-can-call-the-police-all-by-its-lonesome.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/asset-speed-camera-also-checks-your-seatbelt-insurance-can-call-the-police-all-by-its-lonesome.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>&amp;quot;Innocent Until Proven Guilty????&amp;quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/innocent-until-proven-guilty.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Before you read the following article from the Los Angeles Times Newspaper talking about the latest public relation stunt from the city of Huntington Beach, CA please remember the following:</p>
<p>1.      An arrest is not a conviction;</p>
<p>2.      A person is presumed not guilty of a criminal charge until a conviction;</p>
<p>3.      In South Carolina, the judge instructs a jury in a criminal case that "the presumption that the defendant is not guilty remains with them all the way through this trial";</p>
<p>4.      Since when did police agencies get involved in destroying people's reputations-based upon an <span style="text-decoration: underline;">arrest</span>, and not a conviction?</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-1118-drunk-driving-facebook-20101118,0,1798210.story">http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-1118-drunk-driving-facebook-20101118,0,1798210.story</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/innocent-until-proven-guilty.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Body scanners, pat-downs violate law and privacy</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/body-scanners-pat-downs-violate-law-and-privacy.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>Marc Rotenberg</strong>, Special to CNN</p>
<p><strong>(CNN)</strong> Body scanners that peer through clothes are deployed in airports across the country. Travelers who object are subject to "enhanced" pat-downs. Parents watch as their children are groped before boarding a plane.</p>
<p>The elderly are asked to raise their arms high above their heads so that the body scanners can capture a naked image of a 78-year-old man or an 81-year-old woman.</p>
<p>No other country in the world subjects its air travelers to the combination of screening procedures that Americans are being asked to endure.</p>
<p>"Although the constitutionality of airport screening searches is not dependent on consent, the scope of such searches is not limitless," wrote a federal court not long ago.</p>
<p>The government contends that travelers are happy with the new procedures and there are hardly any complaints.</p>
<p>But those claims ring hollow in the face of Americans' real experiences at the airport. In documents obtained by
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/body-scanners-pat-downs-violate-law-and-privacy.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/body-scanners-pat-downs-violate-law-and-privacy.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Padilla ruling extending far beyond deportation cases”</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/padilla-ruling-extending-far-beyond-deportation-cases.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Last term’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Padilla v. Kentucky</span></em> placed an important duty upon criminal defense attorneys to advise clients if a plea of guilty carries a risk of deportation through US Immigration.</p>
<p>But now, state and federal courts are considering applying the ruling’s duty to the defense attorney warn to a host of other collateral areas outside the immigration context.</p>
<p>“One of the biggest questions raised by the <em>Padilla</em> case is, how far does it go?” said Margaret Colgate Love, a Washington solo practitioner who sits on the American Bar Association Commission on Effective Criminal Sanctions.</p>
<p>Lower courts are citing the opinion in challenges to guilty plea agreements that resulted in a number of collateral consequences unforeseen by the defendants – including the loss of public housing, ineligibility to vote, adverse financial consequences, the loss of adoption and child custody rights, the loss of a driver’s license and even
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/padilla-ruling-extending-far-beyond-deportation-cases.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/padilla-ruling-extending-far-beyond-deportation-cases.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lakers Star Guns Ferrari to 110 MPH -- Cops Swoop In </title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/lakers-star-guns-ferrari-to-110-mph-cops-swoop-in.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>11/17/2010 12:05 AM PST by TMZ Staff</p>
<p>For a guy nursing a bum right knee, <strong>Los Angeles Lakers</strong> star <strong>Andrew Bynum</strong> can still move pretty damn fast this according to cops who claim the guy was doing 110 on an L.A. freeway in his Ferrari. <br <br Law enforcement sources tell us Bynum was burning rubber in his customized 2010 Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano on October 29 when cops clocked him going 110 MPH in a 55 MPH zone. <br <br Bynum was eventually ticketed for speeding but dude was lucky he wasn't hauled to the slammer. <br <br Law enforcement sources tell us the only reason he wasn't nailed on a reckless driving charge was because traffic was light and the NBA star wasn't weaving in and out of lanes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In South Carolina speeding violations are broken down into three categories: Less than
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/lakers-star-guns-ferrari-to-110-mph-cops-swoop-in.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/lakers-star-guns-ferrari-to-110-mph-cops-swoop-in.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mel Gibson Admits Slapping, Not Hitting Oksana</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/mel-gibson-admits-slapping-not-hitting-oksana.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>11/15/2010 1:00 AM PST by TMZ Staff</p>
<p>TMZ has obtained <a href="http://www.tmz.com/person/mel-gibson/"><strong>Mel Gibson</strong></a>'s sworn declaration in the custody war with <a href="http://www.tmz.com/person/oksana-grigorieva/"><strong>Oksana Grigorieva</strong></a>, in which Mel admits slapping Oksana because he says she was so hysterical she was endangering the baby but he denies hitting her.<br <br Mel is referring to the explosive argument between the two on the night of January 6, 2010, which triggered the L.A. County Sheriff's Department domestic violence investigation. Oksana claims Mel punched her in the temple and in the mouth, knocking out two teeth.<br <br But Mel tells a very different story. According to <a href="http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/1114_new_mel_doc.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>his declaration</strong></a>, dated June 23, 2010 and filed with the court, Mel says he and Oksana were having one of their frequent arguments at his Malibu home, when Oksana grabbed<strong> Lucia</strong> out her of bassinet, brought her right in the middle of the argument and
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/mel-gibson-admits-slapping-not-hitting-oksana.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/mel-gibson-admits-slapping-not-hitting-oksana.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Oksana to Mel: 'Too Much Evidence, My Dear'</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/oksana-to-mel-too-much-evidence-my-dear.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p />TMZ has obtained emails <strong>Oksana Grigorieva </strong>sent <strong>Mel Gibson</strong> just before their mediation, which Mel's lawyers believe are proof of extortion.  Oksana claims she has "<strong>Too much evidence, my dear</strong>."<br <br According to court documents, Oksana sent the emails on May 2, two weeks before she and Mel went into mediation which resulted in a $15 million package for Oksana and Lucia.<br <br In the email, Oksana accuses Mel and his family of leaking stories to the media about their breakup specifically "...they claim you dumped me."<br <br Mel's lawyers believe the emails show Oksana as a manipulator who was not fearful of Mel at all, but rather someone who was scheming to extort millions.<br <br Oksana writes, "Does your family think that my modesty and class could pass for stupidity?"  She adds, "Do they think, i will let them
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/oksana-to-mel-too-much-evidence-my-dear.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/oksana-to-mel-too-much-evidence-my-dear.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Floyd Mayweather skips hearing</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/floyd-mayweather-skips-hearing.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><cite>Associated Press</cite></p>
<p>LAS VEGAS A Las Vegas court has ordered boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. to stay away from his former girlfriend and their two sons after prosecutors say he hit her and threatened to beat his children if they called 911.</p>
<p>The 33-year-old Mayweather was not required to appear at a hearing Tuesday before Las Vegas Justice of the Peace Diana Sullivan on eight misdemeanor and felony charges. Sullivan gave Mayweather a week to pay $31,000 in bail.</p>
<p>Authorities allege Mayweather also took mobile phones belonging to Josie Harris and his sons following the Sept. 9 dispute.</p>
<p>Mayweather faces charges of felony coercion, grand larceny and robbery, and misdemeanor domestic battery and harassment.</p>
<p>He could face up to 34 years in prison if convicted on all charges. He is due back in court Jan. 24.</p>
<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=5784140">http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=5784140</a></p>
<p>In South Carolina, the misdemeanor offense of "domestic battery" is referred to as "criminal domestic violence."  Based upon the
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/floyd-mayweather-skips-hearing.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/floyd-mayweather-skips-hearing.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Idaho Appeals Court Allows Warrantless GPS Tracking of Motorists</title>
            <link>http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/idaho-appeals-court-allows-warrantless-gps-tracking-of-motorists.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p />Another state court of appeals on Friday saw no problem with police attaching a GPS tracking device to an automobile without first obtaining a warrant from a judge. Idaho's second highest court denied the appeal of Filip Danney who was convicted on marijuana charges based on evidence gained from the spying device.<br <br In March 2007, Ada County Detective Matt Taddicken received an anonymous tip about Danney and decided to investigate. Two months later, he went to Danney's work and placed a GPS tracker on Danney's parked car. Within a few days, the device showed Danney was returning to Boise from a trip to Arcata, California. This was enough to have Taddicken order Danney stopped and searched. Ada County Sheriff's Office Deputy Matthew Clifford claimed that Danney failed to "signal for five seconds prior to changing lanes," and used this as a reason to pull him over.
<p><a href="http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/idaho-appeals-court-allows-warrantless-gps-tracking-of-motorists.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author> steve@stevesumnerlaw.com (Steve Sumner)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesumnerlaw.com/idaho-appeals-court-allows-warrantless-gps-tracking-of-motorists.html</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
